"Hard copies Rolled or folded printed hardcopies are to be forwarded to Copenhagen, with a separate diagram indicating how and in what sequence the illustrations and the text should be mounted and displayed. Remember to include an entry form with the package." "CD-ROM Format = High-resolution PDF (preferred) or JPEG 300 dpi. This resolution is to apply to the full size of the final submission (i.e. 100 cm x 100 cm or 100 cm x 200 cm)." "Illustrations (mono– or polychromatic) and accompanying text are to be presented and displayed on a poster layout within the following framework (see layout guidelines): a. minimum: 100 cm x 100 cm b. maximum: 100 cm x 200 cm" is it me or there is something wrong...because that is on the competition_submissionEssentials...check for yourself: http://www.ifhp2007copenhagen.dk/Student%20Competition/Competition%20Brief/Submission%20Guidelines.aspx

Seems the selected are into certain sense of similarity, but applicable with the theme in year 2030? Anyhow. all did very well. Good Job!

That sucks that they reprinted a whole load of the projects at such a small scale...all that effort for so little exposure. Does anyone have any photos from the exhibition that they could possibly email to me. bryan.cush@gmail.com Just curious to see what the setup was like. Also as someone else posted, could someone please let us know who the winners were and maybe we can find their project in the online submissions. Cheers guys

That sucks that they reprinted a whole load of the projects at such a small scale...all that effort for so little exposure. Does anyone have any photos from the exhibition that they could possibly email to me. bryan.cush@gmail.com Just curious to see what the setup was like. Also as someone else posted, could someone please let us know who the winners were and maybe we can find their project in the online submissions. Cheers guys

yea... do agree.., year 2030 is something to be think about, consider about where is must situaiton besides issues to be tackled. "futures of cities" not future "future cities" in virtual and reality. But do the organiser really taking account of the existing and validate of issues pointed out by the competitors?

yea... do agree.., year 2030 is something to be think about, consider about where is must situaiton besides issues to be tackled. "futures of cities" not future "future cities" in virtual and reality. But do the organiser really taking account of the existing and validate of issues pointed out by the competitors?

there are at the exibition some works that are oversized!some have almost 3 meters wide.And others have 70 cms wide...Is that fair?i think its really frustrating...

if you were lucky your work has been printed out in the original size...if not your efforts finished on a "post-card"size...do you feel lucky?

I agree with some of the sentiments expressed here - where is the results of the competition? The students have spent a lot of time submitting their work and all they get is silence. It is not that difficult given that you have everything on this sit. It is not just about only informing the winners. A quick, short email to all participants thnaking them for their effort would have been sufficient.

an excellent international student competition but letting the students down badly with their silence.

Umm yes, some word from the organizer would be much appreciated.

Organizer should send over some complimantary for those entries members for their good respones in the competition and as well as the efforts putting on as the appreciation of to make the event happen. regards.

the jury said: "we had a very high quality on the responses this year"...so i can complement: yeah, the students works are really high quality in general, but that doesnt mean that the exibition is high quality. Mainly because it has not corresponded to that quality of the responses.regards

interested Public_see post #16...i have posted the results there.Since the organization "doent have the time to do it".

the organization sucks... i never saw such iresponsability!

all the unfair things happen how to convince people to enter the future competitions of it? it need to be think about it. or else it ends here.

"futures of cities" not "future cities" pls take note. year 2030 what will going to happen. the issues the fact need to be validate as the consideration of a total view should be there rather then just a imaginary design structure floating which away from land. why don't in the sky, in the space and galaxy? think about it for 2030.

Parece que estamos todos de acuerdo... no falta mucho para el 2030! y estamos hablando de proyectos totalmente irrealizables!!! ese es el futuro de las ciudades??? parecen soluciones globales, que podrían estar en cualquier parte del mundo... qué pasa con la identidad de los países ante el efecto de la globalización?? perdón por escribir en castellano, sé muy poco ingles... me alegro de que pensemos de la misma manera, creo que los organizadores del concurso plantearon de manera equivocada el tema...realmente esperaba otra cosa...

We are very sorry that you had to wait two days for the competition results being published on the web. Retrospective, it would offcause had been better that the results where accessible September 25th and not September 27th, but you also have to have in mind that we are a very few people both organising the Student Congress and Competition. We received 193 projects in the competition, which is twice as much as any prior IFHP Student Competition. We would like to stress, that all of the projects are displayed on the excibition. Out of the 193 projects, 80 projects used the oppitunity to send the poster only digitally. The jury did work on the digital material and the models as well, so all have been treated equal. For the exhibition, we have done a printing of those projects not delivering a printed poster – due to the great number of entries in 50% size = generally 1m wide. Original printed material is also presented. As you have seen, we have used all the table capacity we could arrange in the hall. The alternative was only to show the awarded project or in other way to make a reduction of the displayed material. So I as well as the jury and the IFHP board have all expressed, that they are very pleased by the quality of the exhibition. I agree, that a few can be difficult to read, but we are on the other hand for the first time in the history of IFHP student Competition working on the possibilities´for all to publish their projects on the web. Some of you also wanted to know, prior to the award ceremony, who where nominatet. We are sorry, but that was confidential information, which nobody could give before the award ceremony presented the results.

does that explain that some persons submited 2 diferent f«projects for the competition?what a coincidence the winners submited 2 projects...be more acurate when you define your guidelines...and dont say one thing one day and a diferent one in the future...

with that i mean: dont say one thing at the begining of the competition and other after the results...and i also would like to ask why is that a big amount of models dont respect the size that was asked?i saw some big models there...and they are not build on parts...

WHAT IS THE COMPETITION SCHEDULE FOR 2008?? I AM IN STRONGLY INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATE...THANK YOU!